Thursday, February 28, 2013

The Ugly Face of Feminism - (3)

AMANDA MARCOTTE - STUPID, UGLY AND FOUL-MOUTHED BIGOT

Amanda Marcotte ranks number 3 on Return of Kings post The 9 Ugliest Feminists in America, and is best known for blogging as well as for her writing on feminism and politics.

She drew criticism for her views on the Duke Lacrosse case, leading journalist Cathy Young to describe her as a leader of a "cyber-lynch mob," and that, "in Marcotte's eyes, the real crime of the independent feminists is helping preserve the idea that the presumption of innocence applies even in cases of rape and sexual assault." The post attracted so much negative commentary, including from The New York Times, that Marcotte ended up deleting it.

She also managed to get herself fired from the John Edwards campaign, after her comments on Catholic Church drew fire from both Bill Donahue and the Catholic League - they called her review of the film Children of Men "anti-Christian".

She also managed to get in trouble with her published books. In 2008, her book It's a Jungle Out There: The Feminist Survival Guide to Politically Inhospitable Environments came under fire for having a cover image perpetuating racist tropes. When the book was released, it again set off controversy in the feminist blogosphere for use of images that many saw as racist: the illustrations included stereotypical images of "savage" black Africans being beaten up by a white, blonde, superhero, described as "racist cartoons of 'natives' in a jungle setting." Marcotte was forced to issue an apology, and to agree that a second printing of It's a Jungle Out There would not contain illustrations.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The Face of a LIAR - CONSTANCE BRISCOE


Britain’s most famous female judge ‘lied about leaking Chris Huhne speeding points story to the press’, Vicky Pryce trial is told.

  • Constance Briscoe was arrested for ‘lying to police’
  • Court hears she helped Vicky Pryce to tell journalists about the story
  • Briscoe can ‘no longer be relied upon as a witness of truth’ because of lies
  • She remains under investigation by the police

The lovely liar - Constance Briscoe

Constance Briscoe (pictured) was arrested after telling police she had not been in contact with the media about the story
Britain’s top black female judge is being investigated by police for allegedly lying about her involvement in leaking the Chris Huhne speeding points story to the press, a court heard today.
Constance Briscoe, a friend of Vicky Pryce, was arrested after telling police she had not been in contact with the media about the story, when it later appeared that she had, Pryce’s retrial heard today.
Pryce, 60, denies perverting the course of justice, claiming Huhne coerced her into taking three points for him in 2003.
Last week a jury failed to reach a verdict in Pryce’s trial, prompting a retrial at Southwark Crown Court which started yesterday.
The court has heard Pryce, helped by Briscoe, told journalists about the story to get revenge on Huhne after he left her for PR adviser Carina Trimingham in June 2010.
Prosecutor Andrew Edis QC today read jurors a statement from Detective Inspector Martin Passmore explaining why certain people had not been called as witnesses in the case.
‘Ms Briscoe has provided statements to the police in this case but during the investigation it became apparent that she may have lied about her involvement with the press and that she denied having any contact with the Mail on Sunday or any other media organisation in relation to this story,’ his statement said.
‘Ms Pryce has not been arrested or interviewed in relation to that allegation. For this reason Ms Briscoe has been arrested and is currently under investigation by the police.
‘Ms Briscoe could therefore no longer be relied upon as a witness of truth and on October 2, 2012 the Crown Prosecution Service took the decision not to call Ms Briscoe to give evidence in the case.’
Yesterday Mr Edis told the court Ms Briscoe was a friend and neighbour of Pryce.
‘She was a neighbour of Vicky Pryce in those days and I think she had also had a difficulty in her marriage and they appear to have got closer to each other,’ he said.
‘The two of them appear to have cooked up a plan to go and see the press about Huhne and taking points. They started it together by approaching a man called Andrew Alderson.’
(extracted from WMASAW - full original post here)

Why won't they ever learn that filling top tier positions based on (smelly) female plumbing will only get you grief?

Onward!


Femmie Ridicule

I am in the mood to ridicule something today, and femicunts are right in my line of sight.
I am also making good one of my new year resolutions - and that would be to fire as many potshots as I can into the enemy camp.
Like a sniper I can do damage. Not much since I am only one man in a far corner of the East. But I do what I can to help the cause.

So without further ado.
The following extracts were spotted from amongst the comments from a blog article entitled The 9 Ugliest Feminists in America.
If anyone does not believe the storm of hatred coming for the femmies, they better watch out! The backlash, when it (finally) comes, is going to be SPECTACULAR!
Let's not forget that men manufactured those M&Ms and the Ben&Jerry's that these little lardlettes feast upon.
No more sitting your fat ass on a pillow a man paid for, in a house he paid for, using food he bought to make him (and yourself) a sandwich so you could wax poetic about how hard you have it and sing sad songs of your oppression.
Which is very true. Today's femicunt bashes men and calls for male suppression from her (male invented) computer, run by (male discovered) electricity; she clothes her lardball body in (male-designed and male manufactured) clothes' gorges herself on (male-planted and male-harvested) food; lives and works in (male created and male designed) houses and buildings; then preaches her male hate from the (male invented) platform of the World Wide Web.

This is easy to counter. The next time a femistink, any femistink, bashes men, then turns around and expects you to do something for her, you stare her in the eye, utter the single word "Nope" and walk away. Or better still, tell her "Yo femicunt, do it yourself!" and walk away.

Onward!

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The Ugly Face of Feminism - (2)

HARRIET HARMAN - CORRUPT PUBLIC OFFICIAL
also known as Harriet Harm-The-Man, Harriet Harm-Man, Harriet the Harridan, Harriet/Hattie Har-Person, The Monomaniac, Mad Hattie, The Horrid Hormone, Har-Har, Hopeless Harriet, Harpie Harman
(She's absolutely gorgeous isn't she?)

Harriet Harman has been an influential politician in the UK's Labour Party for the past two decades.

Throughout this time she has been at the forefront of stirring up hatred towards men in order to garner the support of women by, essentially, spreading lies.

Indeed, she has actually been reprimanded by senior government officials for continually misleading the public over issues to do with rape and the alleged gender wage gap.

Her main tactic throughout her career has been to tell women persistently that they are forever being abused and cheated by men (sexually, financially, emotionally, physically etc) and that if they support her, she can protect them from these wicked men. Many of the highly unjust anti-male laws that now exist not only in the UK, but across the western world, are the direct result of her deceits and her dishonesty.

And there can be no doubt at all that she has been responsible for the breakdown of millions of families, countless suicides, rampant fatherlessness,the wrongful conviction of thousands of men, the burgeoning of the welfare state, the massive growth in government bureaucracy and the unwarranted intrusion into the private lives of millions of people.

Link to reprimand from judge regarding lies about rape conviction rate.

See also Harriet Harman Sucks for more information.

Sunday, February 24, 2013

The Ugly Face of Feminism - (1)

I am on a series binge of late :D
I am starting a new series, this time to identify, and put faces to, some of the ugliest (both inside and out) creatures in Feminism today.

We open with SOPHIA GUO - BIGOT
Sophia Guo is a University of Toronto student and feminist activist who participated in the November 16, 2012 protest against the free speech of Dr. Warren Farrell, an activist for men and boys.
Dr. Farrell came to U of T to lecture on the problems of suicide and educational failure of young men. Guo openly posted on the internet that she had vandalized posters promoting the event, and made several public statements advocating sex based violence toward men and boys.
She also, with apparent irony, was captured on video stating that men's rights organizations were "actually hate groups."
Guo's conduct likely stemmed from the climate of violence and censorship toward activists for men and boys so pervasive at the University of Toronto. 


See her video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Girls Behaving Badly - (2)


This the lovely face of CLAIRE MACGARVA.

The original report, republished here, comes from WMASAW (What Men Are Saying About Women).
One who would think that if this was a man, he would be behind bars faster than you can say "Pussy Pass".

Serial thief finally jailed after being convicted of 182nd crime
  • Claire MacGarva shoplifted despite being subject to suspended sentence
  • The 32-year-old is ordered to spend two years in prison
  • Judge tells brunette she is ‘unable to stop offending’

A serial thief has been sent to prison after clocking up her 182nd criminal conviction.
Despite having been given repeated chances to keep out of trouble, Claire MacGarva has persistently re-offended.
The 32-year-old even embarked on a crime spree just two weeks after she was spared prison, stealing a computer and raiding high street shops for more than £400 worth of goods.
However, tonight MacGarva was starting a two year prison term after Judge James Goss QC told the repeat offender she had run out of chances.
‘Every effort has been made by the police, your supervising probation officer and by me to stop you committing crime but regrettably we have failed in our efforts,’ said Judge Goss, sitting at Newcastle Crown Court.
The court heard that when MacGarva went on her latest shoplifting spree she had been the subject of a drug rehabilitation order, conditional discharge, supervision and a suspended sentence.
Judge Goss was also told that MacGarva has had continued efforts from agencies attempting to help her turn her back on a life of crime, but without success.
The long-term heroin addict had been given a suspended jail term last September but just two weeks later stole a laptop during a burglary at the Sunderland Museum.
Four days after that she stole £12 worth of deodorant from Poundland and £53 of protein products from Holland and Barratt in the city.

Friday, February 22, 2013

New Blog

I was alerted to a new blog dedicated to Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) from MarkyMark's site.
Its called This Is Why MGTOW and its good.

So please pop over and have a good read.
Me ... I'm placing it in my blogroll.

Onward!

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

The face of a LIAR - Cecilia Sue


Take a good look at that face.
That is CECILIA SUE - Singapore's very own version of a hypocritical, feminidiot, scumbag liar.

She LIED about her business dealings.
She LIED about her relationship with Mr. Ng.
She LIED in her court testimony.
She LIED about her conduct.
LIES, LIES and yet MORE LIES.

Read the articles yourself:
  1. Questions raised over Cecilia Sue's 11 hours at CPIB
  2. Defence calls Cecilia Sue a liar
  3. Cecilia changes account of fifth tryst with Ng
  4. SMS messages from Cecilia Sue saved ex-CNB chief
  5. Cecilia Sue breaks down in court, insists she is telling "the truth"

There are more. But the five I have linked to are enough to manifest the web of lies this Sue woman spun in order to cover her own (smelly) ass.

And they say women don't lie.

Feminist cunts like her loudly proclaim women's minds are cleaner.
I agree ... because they change it more often.
Such was the case with the cunt'sSue's testimony - it was riddled with inconsistencies and fabrications; to the point the defence branded her a liar publicly in court.
Justice won out as Mr. Ng was acquitted.
And I'd like to see what happens to Sue now.

Onward!

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Cornwall Community News Rips Feminism a New One

I was alerted of this from The Counter Feminist:
DEBUNK THIS EVIL MYTH

Its worth reading several times to get the full import of it -
LIES, LIES and MORE LIES!
Note: Keep firmly in mind that Harriet Harman is one of the worst Pieces of Shit this century has ever produced.
That she is still allowed to spread her filth and lies is stupefying.

The full story and videos are reproduced below before "they" find a way to take it down:
(Reproduced from The Cornwall Community News)

A massive onslaught of hate propaganda aimed at men will hit local media this week.
The local police and council have been orchestrating ‘Domestic Abuse Awareness Week’ for months.
Over the next seven days they will be sending out a volley of inaccurate claims and statistics to the local press designed to make headlines.
That means TV, radio, and the local papers will all be full of what will sound like facts and figures suggesting Cornwall is full of violent men, and beaten women.
They’re all lies. .
Even the hallowed ‘1 in 4 people are a victim of domestic abuse’ statistic is a lie, and here’s how.
The truth behind the lies of ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ .
Violence in the home is all but non-existent.
In the very rare cases it does happen, forty per-cent of the time, it is not men but women who beat up their partners at home..
Neither 1 in 4 people nor 1 in 4 women suffer what any reasonable person would ever class as ‘domestic abuse’.
The last Labour Government paid to have this statistic cooked up.
In 2005, the Home Office paid an American feminist at Royal Holloway and Bedford College £3million for ‘a review of domestic violence’.
She produced a report which broke down the word ‘domestic violence’ and gave it new definitions which were nothing to do with violence at all.
They included:
‘Watching her’
‘Telling her children things she doesn’t want them to know’
‘Criticising her appearance’
‘Sending her unwanted gifts.’
‘Ignoring her’
‘Refusing to have sex with her’
‘Denying her sexuality’
The definitions effectively covered anything and everything – and, it’s worth repeating, had nothing to do with ‘abuse’ or ‘violence’.
Armed with these dreamed up criteria, the College did a survey – not of women at large – but of women in domestic violence refuges.
This meant the research was unrepresentative to start with.
But added to that – because of the wacky criteria they’d just invented for ‘domestic abuse’ – if the researchers got a negative reply to questions about being beaten, they simply kept on, and asked if the interviewee had ever been criticised or ignored.
Incredibly, three out of four women still said ‘No’.
That means that the real ‘domestic abuse’ statistic this:
‘3 out of 4 women in womens refuges say no man every did anything unpleasant to them ever at all.’!
The false figure – that ‘1 in 4’ have suffered abuse – isn’t true at all because the word ‘abuse’ does not actually mean what it says: its meaning has been twisted and its truth stretched – beyond recognition – to mean just being ‘ignored’ or ‘watched’, or even ‘confused’.
London School of Economics Psychologist Oliver Curry explained: “When the ‘1 in 4’ domestic abuse statistic is boiled down, it means this.
“That one in four women over the course of their lives will be ignored for a period of time by their partners.”
He remarked: “It’s unfortunate if energy directed towards solving a really serious problem is dissipated on things like that.”
Founding feminist Erin Pizzey was the first woman in Britain to recognise genuine cases of violence against women.
Erin founded the first UK womens refuge: but she now campaigns for mens rights and speaks out against the ‘domestic abuse’ industry.
She says her genuine attempts to do good were hijacked by man-hating feminists, and that modern ‘domestic abuse’ industry is a dangerous racket.
She explained: “The problem is that the classification for domestic violence covers all acts.
“And the problem with that is you end up with the entire population of Britain in prison.”

She added: “False allegations of domestic violence are common, and they’re used a fast track to a divorce, in order to immediately obtain the home, and child custody.”
Here’s Canadian senator Ann Cools speaking out on the ‘nonsense’ that comes out of Womens Refuges, and how poor and inaccurate the research is.

The new UK Government promised to cut wasteful public spending like the £3million handed out to the dishonest feminist researchers by Labour in 2005.
In fact it’s done very little to stop the millions going to politically correct groups, instead asking councils to decide where to make cuts, leaving the local authorities to cut vital facilities , then moan about how terrible the cuts are.
Cornwall and Devon are still packed with publicly subsidised feminist groups whose primary job it is to repeat these old lies about ‘domestic violence’.
Take ‘AVDA’ – the special anti domestic violence unit within Devon County Council which is behind the police ‘Domestic Abuse Week’.
Look at their homepage, and you’ll see they’ve gone one step beyond carefully skewing research: they’ve just plain made up a load more definitions.
According to ‘AVDA’, if a man ‘confuses’ a woman, he is guilty of ‘psychological abuse’
And there’s a separate section for ‘financial abuse’ on the AVDA page on which they list: ‘Not paying child support’.
The second example of ‘financial abuse’ is even further removed from what sensible people might recognise as ‘abuse’ or ‘violence’.
AVDA say if a person ‘threatens to report their partner to the Benefits Agency or other authorities’ – you guessed it – that’s domestic abuse too.
It would certainly be interesting to know what the council’s benefits agency investigators think of that one.
The truth is that the facts and figures forced down your threat during ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ bear no relation to the real world at all.
If the above examples enough weren’t enough to convince you already, take AVDA’s definition of sexual abuse.
Apparently ‘making someone wear clothes that they haven’t chosen’ – constitutes the serious crime of sexual abuse.
Which would make an awful lot of style-conscious young girls sexual abusers of their friends.
And would also mean that the next time your wife tells you not to wear that awful jumper, you could phone the police and have her jailed for sexually abusing you.
It’s nonsense.
And it’s not silly, or amusing nonsense.
It’s dangerous nonsense.
Blaming the victim is something tyrants have done since time immemorial to mollify the public at large.
Today you only have to switch off your TV or put your paper down to look out at the world around you that it’s men who are the victims of feminist-driven society.
The tyrannical and secret ‘family’ courts deny a man his basic right to a family life.
And official discrimination means that businesses are bound by law to employ women – but not men.
The results can be seen in every street of every town in Britain.
Here are some real statistics for you.
- 90 per-cent of all court-assisted family separations end in a man losing both their home, and contact with their children
- 74 per-cent of court-assisted family separations feature allegations of ‘domestic abuse’
- Former ‘Family Court’ judge Robert Johnson estimates the number of those allegations that are true to be “not many”
- Under new legislation, women have to allege ‘domestic abuse’ to qualify for legal aid
- 40 per-cent of all separating fathers lose contact with their own children within two years
- 1 in 4 homes are single parent headed
- 90 per-cent of the homeless are men
- 60 per-cent of those made redundant in the last 10 years in Britain have been men
- 83 per-cent of new jobs in the last 10 years have been given to women
- In the last ten years the male suicide rate has risen by 70 per-cent
(Sources: Department of Work and Pensions, HMCourts, BBC live interview, Shelter, ONS, and SPIG)
Think on that the next time you see the untrue ‘1 in 4’ statistic repeated on TV, Radio or in the papers, along with the press suggesting you be suspicious of brutal men.
Think about the fact that three out of four women in domestic violence refuges told researchers no man had ever laid a finger on them.
And then maybe think on Burke’s famous lines:
“It is necessary only for good men to say nothing for evil to triumph.”
We believe the evil of ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ is in its instigation.
Among other things, over the next week we hope to show that its authors are officials who abuse or endorse the abuse of families and children.
They’re engaged in the age-old tyrants tactic of blaming a scapegoat for their own crimes.
So ‘Don’t Suffer in Silence’ – as these cynical ‘domestic abuse’ twits put it.
Speak out when you see a media outlet reproduce Government ‘domestic abuse’ propaganda without any journalistic rigour or balance.
Here’s how to complain.
Complain to the BBC (Radio Cornwall or Spotlight that information broadcast in Domestic Abuse week was wrong, or incitement to hatred.
Or phone them on 01752 229 201
Complain to ITV 01752 333333
Complain to Yesterdays Boring News 01752 765500
Complain to the Boring Guardian 01208 74528
Complain to the Snoringman Newspaper 01736 351146
Complain to the Deaf Briton 01872 271451
Complain to The Cornish Times 01579 342174
Complain to the The Cornish and Devon Post 01566 778220
Complain to the Atlantic FM 01872 55 34 00

Complain to the Newquay Voice 01637 878298

Complain to the St Austell Voice 01726 67722
Complain to the St Ives Times 01736 795813
Complain to the The Packet 01326 213333
Get cracking. It only takes a second and you’ll feel better afterwards.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

The worth of a woman

In the wake of Valentine's Day and its detritus, I asked myself - what is a modern woman worth?
Is she worth all the hype she makes herself out to be?

To answer that, we must look at what the modern woman brings, or attests to bring to the table:
  1. She's a LIAR (forever and always, AWALT)
  2. She can't cook
  3. She's filthy
  4. She's greedy and grasping
  5. She's entitled
  6. She plays the Pussy Pass (always)
  7. She trots out the Victim Mentality (all the time)
  8. She has ego (all the time)
  9. She's vain and arrogant (all the time)
  10. She has a hyper-inflated sense of self (all the time)
  11. She has less intelligence than a slug
  12. She's has STDs (probably)
  13. She's on medication for some psycho-somatic disorder (probably)
  14. She's selfish (all the time)
  15. She creates trouble (always)
The answer?
The modern woman is WORTH SHIT.
And she still thinks she's vastly superior to man.

Maybe she'll get it next time.
Only there'll be NO next time - because you must kick her to the curb and make sure you leave her there!
Onward!

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

February 13th is Dump Bitch Day

Image from
http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/
I would like to propose, ahead of Merchant Maureen February 14th, that February 13th be DBD - Dump Bitch Day.

Originally February 13th was coined Dead Bra Day, a day where women were encouraged to ditch their old, grotty bras and buy new ones. Lingerie makers and outlets often hold sales on this day to that very end. It was popularised by Tyra Banks as a day where women could also pamper themselves by indulging in lingerie.

I say since she is on her "pamper herself" trip, she and go pamper herself out of your life. (Remember: fish don't need bicycles.)
In doing so:
  • You will have more time for yourself
  • You will have a better bank balance
  • You will be more sane
  • You can do more meaningful things
So in the words of Captain No Marriage - You are now free to kick her to the curb.
AND MAKE SURE YOU LEAVE HER THERE!

Onward!

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Nomance ...

Ahead of the much vaunted Valentine's Day, that hyper-commercialized day where women metamorphose into demanding entitlement princesses that would make Gina Rio proud (read about this entitlement bitch if you don't know who she is), I am calling, for the 4th year in succession, a TOTAL BOYCOTT of anything even remotely related to February 14th.

Before any sugary protestations start of the "But I love her" sort, ask yourself:
DID SHE DO ANYTHING FOR YOU THIS PAST YEAR TO DESERVE WHAT YOU PLAN TO GIVE HER?

The catalogue of bullshit women dish out these days is unbelievable:
  • shaming language (see this post for examples)
  • belittling you/your abilities in public
  • trotting out the "victim" trump card every single chance they get
  • playing the Pussy Pass every single chance they get
  • False Rape Accusations
  • lies, lies and more lies
  • hypergamy
  • hyper-inflated egos and self-worth
  • bitchiness & greed
  • emotional vampires
  • educationally worthless
  • troublemakers
  • ... and the list goes on
If you can even identify with one item on that list you're in for big time crazy. Then they expect you to turn around, as though nothing has happened, and buy them jewellery, roses, chocolates, expensive dinners just because its Valentine's Day and she deserves it!

I have 3 words - FUCK OFF SOW!
Repeat after me - FUCK OFF SOW!

Do remember that the origins of Valentine's Day were shrouded in paganism and mysticism. Romance only entered the picture after Chaucer wrote the "Parlement of Foules", widely seen as attributing the opening of the birds' mating season with love. Fast forward to 1913 with Hallmark mass-producing cards and commercialization sets in.

Remember also that the modern women is one drunk on "grrrlllll POWAH!", one that will loudly declare "I am woman, hear me roar" and that "fish don't need bicycles". Somehow, that seems to be forgotten on this day, and the "bicycle" will be called upon to be her walking ATM. It may be well to keep firmly in mind that bicycles don't need fish either; especially not greedy, grasping, attitude- and entitlement-ridden fish. They can't cook, can't clean and they are worthless to any organization. In other words, they are worth shit.

So in the grand tradition of Marc Rudov a.k.a The No-Nonsense Man, I say to February 14th 2013 - out with the Merchant Maureens, out with her attitude, and most of all, out with this commercial travesty designated only to part a man with his (hard-earned) money. I also say the sooner you kick her sorry ass to the curb and Go Your Own Way, the happier you will be.

Onward!

Saturday, February 09, 2013

Lunar New Year 2013


Here's wishing all my Chinese and Asian visitors
a great Year of the Snake!

(Lantern illustration courtesy of Vector Open Stock)
(The cartoon Snake is from Free Design Files)
(Additional Chinese wording my own)

Friday, February 08, 2013

Girls Behaving Badly - (1)

I'm kicking off a new series to show the world, and any disbelieving parent, that their adorable princesses whom they imagine can do no wrong, are in reality evil Pieces of Shit completely capable of unedifying behaviour.

This came from Yahoo Ireland.

Not surprisingly, most of the comments single out the fact that had you stepped in to prevent such a thing from happening, you yourself would be either accused of sexual assault or slapped with an FRA. Which was why on crowded public transport in full view, no one stopped to help the girl. Bravo femtards, THIS is what your equality had come to. THIS is what your endless peregrinations have amounted to - horrific behaviour from aggressive, out-of-control women knowing they can't be held accountable.

The UK police have put out a call to name the girls responsible. My guess is that no one will for the expedient reason of protecting one's own skin. The same goes for the "name and shame" calls, no one will ever want to get involved with girls like these. Even if they do get caught, they will walk away with either community service or a reprimand. In the other words, The Pussy Pass will come to their rescue. Yet again.

Kudos then, to feminism. THIS is what your "grrrrrrllllllll POWAH" has achieved.
Onward!

Saturday, February 02, 2013

The Face of a LIAR - Tawana Brawley

Here is the face of a monstrous liar - the notorious TAWANA BRAWLEY


She was found guilty of a rape lie and now is being held accountable.
This article is music to my ears - you can read it (with formatting) here.
Full transcript of article follows:

Tawana Brawley served with court order to pay man she accused of rape in 1987
Rape-hoax $lap

Infamous hoaxster Tawana Brawley — whose outrageous rape lie 25 years ago inflamed racial tensions nationwide — yesterday was finally slapped with a court order to settle a hefty defamation case against her.
“For at least 25 years, she has been living a major lie,” said former Dutchess County prosecutor Steven Pagones, who was falsely accused of raping Brawley in 1987 and finally tracked her down, thanks to The Post.
“To me, this has always been about responsibility and accountability,’’ added the former ADA, who won the $190,000 defamation lawsuit against Brawley, 40, now a nurse in Virginia, more than a decade ago.
At 9 percent interest, that debt, which Brawley never attempted to pay off, now totals $431,492, according to the wage-garnishment papers filed in Virginia’s Surry County Court.
Brawley — whose unbelievable lies made the Rev. Al Sharpton a household name as he bombastically championed her cause — had changed her name and moved down South in the years since she was exposed.
Her fugitive-like antics long thwarted Pagones’ efforts to serve her with the court papers needed to get the financial damages due him.
But The Post finally found Brawley last month, effectively leading Pagones and his lawyer to her.
She was living under the assumed name of Tawana Vacenia Thompson Gutierrez in Hopewell, Va., and working as a licensed nurse at The Laurels of Bon Air, a nursing home in nearby Richmond.
According to Pagones’ lawyer, Garry Bolnick, the single mom’s wages could be docked 10 to 25 percent per paycheck as retribution for her lies.
Pagones said he might waive his entitled windfall — if Brawley finally ’fesses up.
“There is a feeling of unfinished business to it,” he said of the case that ended his career and cost him his marriage. “I look at this as another opportunity for her to tell the truth.
“People criticize me for going after a hardworking single mother trying to support herself and child. My argument has been she has not been held accountable.
“If she is not going to tell the truth, then it is about the money. That is the only way to hold her accountable,” said Pagones, who is now principal owner of a private investigations firm.
But Pagones said he wonders if Sharpton will again try to rush to her aid and bail her out.
“I’ve got to believe since he is primarily responsible for all the damage done, I would think he would come to her aid. That’s what I expect,” Pagones said.
Seemingly a lifetime ago, a 15-year-old Brawley of Wappingers Falls in Dutchess County was found in a trash bag covered in feces with the words “n- - - -r” and “bitch” scrawled upside down on her body and “KKK” carved into her shoe.
Sharpton, still relatively unknown outside New York City, and lawyers Alton Maddox and C. Vernon Mason, immediately took up her cause as she claimed she was attacked by a gang of white men, including Pagones.
When 28-year-old Fishkill Police Officer Harry Crist Jr., committed suicide a week later — likely over a romantic breakup and failing the New York State Police exam — Sharpton and his allies used the incident to accuse Crist of participating in the rape.
When Pagones, a friend of Crist, offered an alibi for his besmirched dead friend, he found himself accused of raping Brawley nearly three dozen times.
After a year of hell, a grand jury found Brawley’s accusations without any merit. She likely fabricated the story because she feared her stepfather’s wrath for staying out late, according to the grand-jury evidence.
“This has been on my mind every time Sharpton has been in the news,” Pagones said of the case.
“I am reminded of the damage Tawana Brawley, Sharpton, Mason and Maddox caused. It’s something I live with all the time.”
In 1997, Pagones won a defamation lawsuit against Sharpton, Brawley and her lawyers.
Maddox was found liable for $97,000, Mason for $188,000, and Sharpton was ordered to pony up $66,000, money that was coughed up by O.J. Simpson lawyer Johnnie Cochran and others.
Additional reporting by Amber Sutherland, Reuven Fenton and Michael Gartland

Maybe she'll get it next time.
Onward!