Women ARE Stupid -The Irrefutable Proof II

Jan Moir.

Where have we heard that name before?

Ahhhh - she was the one who wrote an article lambasting gay marriage which somehow managed to draw the death of Stephen Gately into the picture.

Deliberate? Or just plain S-T-U-P-I-D, stoooopiiid stupid?

Now I haven't any bone to pick if you are plain against civil unions of the homosexual variety. Its your point of view. You're entitled to it. But to write an article about it and draw in a celebrity whose recent death struck a raw chord in the music industry is just plain dumb. Even worse, the dumb bee-yotch managed to attribute Gately's death to unnatural causes (his homosexuality) and concluded, smugly, that there was no "happily ever" after for gay marriage.

But women are like that. Act first, think later. Then act shocked when the article drew an unprecedented 25,000 complaints. Even commentators on Yahoo! have purported that "if you manage offend a Daily Mail reader, you have gone too far". Did any of that register with Miss Jan 'shit-for-brains' Moir? Nope. All she cared for was the triumph of her skewed views, sans logic and compassion, and went to press with it.

After even record company Polydor registered its disgust, 'shit-for-brains' Moir did an abrupt volte-face . She issued a public apology. Yup, you read that right. She issued a public apology. She did not take down her article, nor retrace her comments, she just issued a public apology which, in the light of its oily attempts at mea culpa was really no apology at all.

Like I said, women are stupid beyond belief, as Jan Moir has demonstrated and is reinforced by the actions of Gema Revelles. For readers' interests, Revelles cooked up a false rape accusation against her former employer, then expressed disbelief that the "English authorities would take the attitude they did" and slap a nine-month prison sentence on her.

Maybe they'll get around to it next time.

Onward!

No Ma'am

Lately, more and more blogs are focusing on what a bad deal women are for men. In Feminism's wake, we have landed squarely in a culture of allegations that have made it impossible for men. It has gotten so bad that recently a South American man has been jailed for kissing his 8-year old daughter on the beach!

Since the femnags keep trumpeting that women need men like a fish needs a bicycle, in-fighting along those lines can prove very rewarding. It has already been written across the web that modern women are narcissistic, egotistical bitches. Turn that "I, Me, My" attitude on its head by not pandering to her at all and the results may be entertainingly ballistic.

Simply put, modern women have a grossly inflated sense of self-worth. They feel they are too good for men. That would explain the influx of sites like Facebook and Twitter. My counter is equally simple. Become Zero Tolerant and have nothing to do with them. It translates into "if-you-are-too-good-for-me-then-you-don't-need-me". And watch them hit the roof!

May I then offer a few tips on erecting and maintaining this façade of a Zero Tolerance Man:

1 - Disdain

This is your best defence. Treat women like a nasty smell, a freshly squashed cockroach or turds is certain to make your point. I go about on public transport with a stony look at all times. As a friend of mine put it, "it makes winter seem warm". You may have to cultivate this "look of hate" especially if it goes against your grain. But the end result is worth it.

2 - Avoidance

- Treat women like they don't exist. Look straight through them. If they are texting/gossiping/reading while walking, don't turn aside, walk straight into them. And walk on without either apologizing or acknowledging.

- Talk to women only when absolutely necessary. Choose your words carefully and limit your answers to monosyllables if needs be. If they initiate the conversation, end it abruptly and walk away.

- In public, avoid women. On the bus, park yourself near groups of men rather than women, or choose to sit with men for example. If that gets branded you a homosexual, so what? Better wrongly classed as gay than to have your life ruined by false rape/molestation accusations.

- Do not let women chat you up at parties. Disengage at the earliest opportunity if stuck.

- Do not date. If you must, ensure she pays her share. Any women who sees you as a meal ticket should not even be given the courtesy of a night out.

3 - Boycott

- DO NOT MARRY! No fault divorce has become commonplace. Too common. And why, for that matter, should a man hand over half of his present assets as well as half of his future earnings to some undeserving bitch just because she got bored with married life?

- DO NOT COHABIT! In some countries and its becoming commonplace too, that to have a woman live with you is enough for her to demand a chunk of it. Letting a woman into your house is a ruinous decision. Period.

- AVOID SINGLE MOTHERS! They are the worst deal on the planet. Why pay for child rearing when they are not yours? They will resent you because you are not their father. You can't discipline them. You are not her first priority.

- Have nothing to do with companies who use misandric advertising or male-bashing tactics. If we can't abide by racism, is misandry any different? My previous post Misandric = Boycott had a list of companies to boycott. Check this website Stand Your Ground for updates to that list.

4 - Go Your Own Way aka MGTOW

- You always come first. Never forget that.

- Dress for yourself to look your best, not because some woman wants you to.

- Likewise drive the car you want/like, and not some flashy set of wheels to impress women -not worth it.

- Eat what you want, when you want.

- Pursue sport, hobbies, pastimes that are edifying to you.

- Work on self-improvement.

5. Always Know Where Your Sperm Are

- If your sexual drive gets the better of you, masturbate. You're in control, its easy, gratifying and instantaneous. The sin of Onan was, contrary to what the fire-eating Baptists may preach, interrupted intercourse, NOT masturbation. ("And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother's wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother. [Genesis 38:9])

- The blogs are awash with horror stories of women stuffing their vaginas with the sperm from used condoms, and then suing the man for child support when they get pregnant. If you must have sex, use condoms. And always keep the used condom wadded up in a tissue where she can't reach for it, or flush it down the toilet repeatedly till it disappears, or burn it.

- Use industrial strength spermicide inside and out. For safety sake, stick a spermicidal pessary into her as well.

- The most radical method is to get a vasectomy. Store sperm in a bank before going for the snip. After the procedure, obtain a notarised document from BOTH lawyer and surgeon stating that the surgery was carried out. Also obtain two or three sperm test records that show absence of sperm. That way, if the woman threatens you with a child-support lawsuit, insist on a paternity test and show her the documents. Then coldly watch her bluster and her dreams crumble. (Note: this trick originally came from someone called Zammo on Dump Your Wife NOW!)

Some of these tricks came from Zero Tolerance Man, others are my own.

Whatever, as MarkyMark would say, "the life you save may be your own".

Here's to the the single existence always!

Onward!

The Face of a LIAR

Much has been written about the Hofstra rape case for me to expound it here. You can read all the delicious facts over at such seminal blogs as

MarkyMark's Thoughts On Various Issues

The False Rape Society

What Men Are Saying About Women

What the press has succeeded, thus far, is bestowing victimhood on the false accuser, hiding her name and her picture. Now, thanks to the due diligence of MarkyMark, we know what she looks like and her name!

That's what she looks like and DANMELL NDONYE is her name. Take note, all, for that is the face of a liar. Danmell Ndonye had a five-man sex orgy in a college bathroom and later accused the 5 men she had sex with of rape. Although Danmell Ndonye later recanted (as usual), the writing is on the wall for the 5 men she falsely accused.

An interesting comment surfaced on The False Rape Society. There, someone said that Danmell Ndonye hadn't been punished as she had been punished enough. Think about it he said, Danmell Ndonye has been suspended from college and is unlikely that other colleges will now accept her, Danmell Ndonye has a bad rap, Danmell Ndonye won't be able to get a boyfriend, etc etc.

You know what? Tough shit! If Danmell Ndonye can't do any of the aforementioned things, then its Danmell Ndonye's own fault. If Danmell Ndonye has jeopardised the reputations of an entire reputation of African women, then its Danmell Ndonye's own fault. Danmell Ndonye should have considered these matters out of hand before making that accusation. I care not one whit about poetic justice. If Danmell Ndonye is a false accuser, then it is my duty to let the world know that Danmell Ndonye is to be avoided.

You might have noticed that I used Danmell Ndonye's name a great deal. I got that idea from MarkyMark. He, too, used Danmell Ndonye's name at every conceivable opportunity and I quote: "As a public service, I ... am posting here for the world to see; men need to KNOW what this sociopathic bitch looks like!! I think it's only fitting, since she didn't receive any punishment for her crime."

I may only one single man here in Singapore. But ... little things can, and do add up to large amounts. I can, and will make sure that Danmell Ndonye's name is trumpeted across this viral media we know as the Internet. I also will make sure that in using Danmell Ndonye's name, the search engines will pick it up and know what a detestable creature she is.

Onward!

The Feminist Scorecard -III

If I had to give thanks for one thing, I mean the one thing I am truly grateful for, it would have to be technology. Today, with modern appliances I can get dinner on the table in 30 minutes, communicate in real time with my counterpart halfway across the world, buy things online that are otherwise unavailable in my part of the world, and the list goes on.

Which set me thinking. If women claim to be better than men, does that claim stand up to the test of time? I decided to hit my library to see if women had made any inventions which contribute to the betterment of our lives as we know it today:

Electricity -Benjamin Franklin (Discoverer); Male
Computer -Charles Babbage/Alan Turing/Konrad Zuse (Inventor/s); Male
Telephone -Alexander Graham Bell (Inventor); Male
Cellphone - Martin Cooper (Inventor); Male
Car -George A. Long/Karl Benz (Inventor/s); Male
Washing machine -Jacob Christian Schäffer/Henry Sidgier/Nathaniel Briggs (Inventor/s); Male
Microwave oven -Percy Spencer (Inventor); Male
Television -Philo Taylor Farnsworth (Inventor); Male
Radio -Guglielmo Marconi/Nicola Tesla/Alexander Popov (Inventor/s); Male
Sewing Machine -Barthelemy Thimmonier/Elias Howe/Isaac Singer (Inventor/s); Male

From the list it is clear. All the devices which we take for granted today and have significantly impacted our lives have all been propounded by MEN. This is just the tip of the iceberg. I haven't even included those from history. So where are the wimmin? And where are their inventions? By the way I don't consider trouble an invention.

It is blatantly obvious. Men are responsible for what we have today. We are also responsible for no longer having to live in caves, which may well be a plausible scenario had we left it to wimmin.

Maybe they'll get around to it next time.

Onward!

The Feminist Scorecard -II

Its been a while since I posted.

I've been busy, very busy. Also a change in the weather here in Singapore has brought the germs and I came down with a nasty cold and cough.

At least I've got work to do. Not unlike the femnags who sit around on their great fat tushies all day and bash men.

Which got me thinking.

I was listening, well re-listening really, to the B-minor Mass whilst marking student assignments and the thought struck me: Where are the female composers?

That got me excited so I Googled it.

Wikipedia was the first entry and it trumpeted a long list of female composers from pre-1500 to the present. Trolling it, I made a surprising (!?) discovery: in over a millenia, there have been only a few notable female composers and these can be counted on the fingers of one hand.

1. Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179)\

2. Eleanor of Aquitaine (1122-1204)

3. Maria Malibran (1808-1836)

4. the Boulanger sisters - Lili (1893-1918) and Nadia (1887-1979)

And of these female composers, only Hildegard of Bingen and Nadia Boulanger have recordings attributed to them.

So, if women are better than men, why are the CD catalogues teeming with recordings by the greats - Bach, Charpentier, Mozart, Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Tchaikovsky, Schubert, Schumann et al? Why are the performance artists clamouring to perform works by the very same, and are not supremely eager to champion a work by, say Amy Beach? (By the way, Amy Beach "composes" such racuous nonsense I can't even call it music. I don't know anybody who does!)

So the point is clear: in music the men reign. Maybe they'll get round to it next time.

Onward!

Off topic: NDP or NDF?

Parade or Farce?

That's what I asked myself after watching an encore telecast of our Nation's 44th Independence celebrations a.k.a. the National Day Parade.

To begin with, the traditional march-past was relegated to a minor episode in the shindig -Chapter 3 for the record. Now, Singapore's defences may not be much, unlike Brazil or Argentina who, when they celebrate Independence, they trot out all their colours and it takes all day to march past. But this is a parade, hello-o-o-o?

Instead, what we had was a history of Singapore "told in 10 chapters" according to the commentators. First up, founding our Island Nation with ham actors Mark Lee and Suhaimi Yusof playing Parameswara and Sang Nila Utama respectively. Backed by a swirling melange of secondary school students -this year's "choir"- they hammed it up big time. Oh well, I guess there are worse ways to narrate history.

And that "choir"! Now yours truly was honoured to be in the very first parade that incorporated a choral element way back in 1981. We not only had to sing the newest songs composed for the nation, but re-learn existing ones with 4-part harmony! A very Villa-Lobos-esque moment occurred in 1983 when we were told that the pledge for that year would not be recited but sung! Anyway, this year's "choir" did more running around waving great paws made of some strange orange material rather than singing! And if a choir's not to sing, then WTF are they there for? They did not even sing the National Anthem!

The second chapter is a long drawn out affair on "Defending Our Nation". All I can say is that its elaborately staged, interspersing CNA-esque footage with our "military assets" (commentator's words) doing everything from neutralising bombs to disarming terrorists. Hey, they'd better be as good if the real thing comes along!

This year's highlight was to have been a united Pledge Moment at 8:22pm on the day itself. I was at the supermarket with my mother at that exact same time and, do you know, even when it was announced, no one stopped to recite the Pledge? Talk about National Solidarity!

I won't say anymore. Patriotism is fine when you are swept away by the heat of the moment, i.e. watching the parade at Marina Bay itself. Cast in a colder light the "parade" um ... doesn't hold up. They've had their share of lulus in the past, such as an enormous cake-like edifice that was the crowning glory of the 25th Parade in 1990; or the appearance of the season 1 Singapore Idol finalists in 40th year parade. But this!

I won't be a sourpuss so ... Happy 44th Birthday Singapore!

But we'll certainly have to do better with a display which is more National Day Farce than National Day Parade!

Onward!

(image courtesy of Channel News Asia)

The Feminist Scorecard -I

Lately the blogs are all abuzz with how women are better than men.

Or not.

So in this new series, I thought I'd take a look at all the areas where women claim to be better than men. And what better place to start with than the Nobel Prize?

The Nobel Prize has been awarded since 1901, and is always given to outstanding achievements in the fields of Chemistry, Physiology/Medicine, Physics, Literature and Peace. There is also an associated prize, The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. Instituted by Sweden's central bank in 1968, this was first awarded in 1969. With the sole exception of the Peace category, all the major contending categories are male-dominated.

Since 1901, there have been 754 male Nobel Prize winners and 35 female ones. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_Nobel_laureates) 35 wimmen in a century, with many years having no female nominee at all. The numbers speak for themselves.

Maybe they'll get round to it next time.

Onward!