Saturday, July 11, 2009

Blaming ALL Feminists is BAD!!

Oh yeah?

I came across this whilst searching for quotes to enliven my next few posts when I came across this. Its from a blog called Hunting For Archetypes ( and its a good read, albeit somewhat inflammatory. A private message was attacked and the attack is summarized as: "Real" feminists (from the early 20th century) would vomit acid if they knew what would happen to "their" movement. The people calling themselves that today are usually vile people who hijacked a noble cause. Therefore, it's unfair to label all feminists as being the same."

Here is the blogger's response to that attack. Enjoy!

Well, it's "actual Feminists" tough luck then, because present day Feminists are female-supremacist manhaters, and their reputation is well earned, and will only get worse (I hope and pray)।

The ideology, and more importantly the RESULTS of the ideology, are destructive, divisive, sexist, and morally repugnant. Adherence to feminist principles has led to laws and policies which have almost completely succeeded in sundering society right down gender lines, with two-tier citizenship in all but name.

I don't care one iota if hundreds or even thousands of "good feminists" are "unfairly" slighted by inclusion. If they were such "good Feminists" they wouldn't have allowed this to happen. Failing that, they would be ACTIVELY supporting men's rights organizations, rather than submitting them to a tortuous propaganda smear job.

The proof is in the pudding, and quite frankly NONE (and I'm dead serious when I say this), absolutely none of you have shown any way in which women are actually "oppressed", and I can show inequality ENSHRINED IN LAW against men....and you say "that's justified" by Patriarchy Theory. Fair enough, I say "prove it" since all these things were done in the name of this theory.

Know what?

NONE of you ever have. Not one of you can even explain what it means beyond a vague "men are in charge" definition. None of you can show a single benefit of any importance to men as a result of societal bias, let alone socially condoned behaviour or even law. There's PLENTY of evidence of it going the other way though.

So do I think every single person who self-identifies as a Feminist deserves to be lumped in with the "extremists"?

You bet your ass I do.

I think that says it all doesn't it? Onward!

Misandric Company = Boycott

Stand Your Ground ( has a fabulous list of companies that ABSOLUTELY must be boycotted from the misandric tone of their advertising. This ranges from mildy offensive (but offensive nevertheless) jokes making fun of men, to downright odious man-bashing.

While most of the companies are American, quite a few stand out because they have reached an overseas audience too. Unfortunately, these are companies whom we ourselves patronize with nary a second thought as to the tenor of their advertising/marketing. This goes to prove that if we spread the message as far as we can reach, these companies will feel the loss of revenue and (hopefully) change their tune. Even though some of these ads are long gone, we must show these companies that MRAs are like elephants - we never forget. And if by not forgetting we vote with our feet as well as with our dollars, so much the better!

Some of these companies I now list below:
Heineken: offensive ad with Carrie-Ann Moss
Ford Motors: male-bashing commercial
Post-It Notes a.k.a 3M: misandric, prejudiced and discriminatory product captions
The Body Shop: blatant anti-male campaign
Reebok: misandric TV ads displaying men acting like fools
Walls Ice Cream (UK): male bashing commercial; entitlement princess glorified
Subway: Male-bashing ad
Liz Claiborne: Misandric report & radio ad campaign
Toys R Us: Anti-boy TV commercial
Quantas: discrimination against men, male hatred
Air New Zealand: Same as Quantas
British Airways: Same as Quantas
Nokia: Misandric ad, capitalizing off misandry
Kraft Foods: Male-bashing ad
V8: Drink radio commercial demeans men
Trojan condoms: Especially offensive & misandric commercial
Pepsi: (Unfunny, atrocious & offensive) male sexual mutilation & groin jokes
Budweiser: Same as Pepsi
Burger King: Blatant "man-slapping-by-woman" commercial

I'll be especially alert to publicise my boycott (and reasons why) of these companies from now and forever more. Definitely I've eaten my last Subway (**sigh**) and drunk my last Pepsi (**double sigh**). But sacrifices have to made for the good of MRA. If these companies blatantly profit off man-bashing then I, for one, do not want my (hard-earned) dollars to go anywhere near them. Simply put, they do not deserve it.


Friday, July 10, 2009

The MRA Movement is wider than you think it is ...

Every day, as I read the blogs I'm "tuned" into, I'm seeing more and more links to anti-misandry.

This can only be a good thing.

However, most of these sites still just bewail the sad state of affairs. We, as men, still have to take the reins and not figuratively raise the white flag of surrender just because Feminism keeps shifting the goal post. Most MRA sites have concluded that Feminism a.k.a Fembots a.k.a. Femcunts a.k.a. Feminazis are incapable of logic. They just spew their vitriol and/or cut off anyone attempting to reason with them. This, then, is one of the golden rules for dealing with the abovementioned trash. Simply, and coldly state the facts, pointing out the glaring omissions in her faulty logic and watch her take flight.

Of note are the followings sites and blogs I have found:
  1. The S.C.R.U.F.F Manifesto (
  2. (
  3. Stand Your Ground (
The last site -Stand Your Ground- has a fantastic section on companies that should be boycotted because of misandry and/or male-bashing. I was horrified to find Subway, Nokia, Pepsi and even Toys R Us among the list. Suffice to say I will never eat another Subway sandwich, drink Pepsi or buy from Toys R Us. I will also urge my male friends to use other mobile phones such as Samsung rather than Nokia. If enough of us boycott the brand, it should send a wake up call to said companies that the male dollar is just as valuable as the Femcunt one. Unless said companies are as arrogant as the Singapore government, who, at one time sought to persecute the gay community but said nothing when it came to receiving business from the "pink dollar".

Happy reading!

Sunday, July 05, 2009

The Feminist Mistake

MarkyMark (whose blog links to mine in the blogroll and I his likewise) had this post which made me flip. Suffice to say, its not the sort of thing I'd ideally want to read on the Fourth of July holiday. I also chose not respond to the post comment-wise, but saved it to expound here on my own blog.

This woman, Kim, begins in typical feminazi-style: "You can NOT blame this ALL on women. It’s not the women running the show when it comes to passing laws, its men. But you already knew this. So why are the MRAs bashing women?" I wonder if she'd just fallen off the turnip truck to make a statement like this. Where have the women been if not running the show for the last 40 years? Plus making snide statements along the way like The man is the head of the house and the women the neck, but its the neck that turns the head. As further proof of this exploitative manipulation, witness what the femcunts did to Obama's stimulus package ["No Country For Burly Men",].

She then goes into an orgy of whinging about being indoctrinated into the feminist mentality, about how it coloured her peceptions etc etc. At the heart of this crap (yes, that's what it is) is still the Entitlement Princess' voice - "me", "me", "me"; "I", "I", "I"; "gimme", "gimme", "gimme" (but alas for her, no Man After Midnight).

After her self-pitying and self-proselytising, the heart of the matter is the paragraph where she claims women want to hear the magic words. That women are still loved, still wanted, will still be taken care of by men. Uh, uh darling. I don't think so. After 4 decades of being told that "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle", and force-fed the notion that men are no more than cannon-fodder in the gender war, guess what? Men have walked away! Its a surprising action. Where the masses would have expected men to fight, tooth and nail, for what's right, instead men have chosen to vote with their feet. They walked away. And are still walking away. As fast as their feet will carry them if I may add.

The worst is when she claims that feminism is a mistake. A MISTAKE!!!! And to even suggest that men are culpable in the perpetration of this odious "mistake" is too much. I speak for myself here. But I cannot, in all honesty, think of even ONE man, after 40 years of feminist claptrap, will willingly crawl contritely, cap in hand, when a woman crooks her finger and decides to write off 40 years of demonizing men as "A MISTAKE".

She then claims: "These young women are going through this, they are hurting. They aren’t acting this way because they like it. They act this way because they are told these things, and now they are lost." This is complete and utter bollocks. Women get their kicks from demeaning men, preferably publicly because they feel its cool to do so. It gives them power - Empowerment (to use a feminazi term) if you will. Then to turn around and utter that "its ok to NEED a man. Just say the words and you’ll hear the sighs of a million women in unison from across this country" is hypocrisy at its feminist best. This, with a brazen demand for, but couched in hypocritical mea culpa that we men turn around and clean up feminism's shit? Most men would say in response "STFU" and "FOS" (I'll leave you to decode those acronyms yourself!).

Feminism has already seen the signs of its implosion. Its hold was vacuous and tenuous at best. Men do not need to apologize for 40 years of Feminism. We neither wanted nor condoned Feminism although it was foisted on us nonetheless. Nor should we tolerate "mistakes" like Andrea Dworkin, Betty Friedan, Maureen O'Dowd and their ilk. It is the spawn of Feminism, the armies of women today crying out that no man will even look their way who should atone for the grievous sins they have committed against men. And beg to be restored to their rightful places as wives and mothers. Preferably on their knees.

A change in direction

Realizing that more than a year has slipped by with no post is disconcerting.

Realizing that notable luminaries in the Mens' Rights Activism (MRA) circle -MarkyMark for one- has added you to his blogroll and you have no new posts to show is downright dismaying.

In the past I was a lurker on the boards and forums for Mens' Rights, along with notable websites for anti-misandry. Getting into a state of righteous indignation was well and good. BUT ... I also realized that getting all worked up from the comfort of your armchair while others pulled the plough was not cool. So I have decided that my hand must till the land too.

Unfortunately I am only one man, and one man in Singapore where misandry is slowly but surely encroaching. What is one to do? Campaigning against Singapore's draconian government is folly. I can, thus, only spread the word by blogging. Hopefully men will read, open their eyes and above all, know what is befalling them.

All my previous posts were carefully "cooked" before being published. This ensured I had said what needed saying in the best possible language. While I am not about to remove those older postings, current and future posts will now reflect what's currently happening, especially if the subject is MRA and/or anti-misandry. I'm not above the occasionally "cooked" post (there are several waiting in the wings) for reader enjoyment. By and large, this new direction should enable me to post with greater frequency.