Deloitte & Touche are a respectable accountancy firm. Or so till recently. Ms Holly "cunt-for-brains" Leam-Taylor sent a saucy email to a small group of her like-minded colleague ilk. The email was a vote on the most attractive men in her office. She had intended it as a "light-hearted joke to celebrate Christmas". Or so she thought. She ought to have known that: 1. Corporate email is for corporate matters; and 2. Email, like anything on the internet, has a peculiar tendency to spread like a bushfire. To say that her bosses were not impressed was an understatement. It cost her her job. Although I wonder if she left voluntarily or was made to leave? Even she herself admitted in the email her actions "massively violates the HR equal opportunities policy". But she did it anyway. Stupid? Or shit-faced stupid? Not much to choose there. Maybe she'll get round to fixing it it next time. Onward!
Since the last post about the stupidity of Jan Moir, much has happened to want to make me pen it down, but on retrospect, I decided it was too flippant, trivial or simply not earth-shaking enough to warrant a blog entry and thus continuation.
What happened at the supermarket, whilst waiting at the checkout fuelled the impetus to pen it down: my ears were assaulted by the whinging, nasal tones of the complaining Singapore woman. Turning, I was confronted by the sight of a middle-of-the-road girl loudly bemoaning the appearance of a pimple on (to her) her flawless complexion.
Now Singapore women are eternally whiny, their voices irking like a sheep in pain. This was no different. What struck me was her language. It would have made a pirate blush. Every second word was either an expletive, a curse or a word demeaning men, boys and other people, in that order. The gist of her running narrative, was a diatribe on how despite her looks and charm (!?!?!?!?), she fails to hook a boyfriend. The reasons for that should be obvious, though not to her.
While I will expound on the many charms of the Singapore woman in a later post, this young woman embodies the bad in her sex: lack of looks, charm and wit - need I add she was dressed like a tramp, was wheeling a trolley which consisted of her and her friends' oversized shoulder bags and one (count em' folks, ONE!!!) can of beer. But instead of looking within, she conveniently takes pot shots in blaming everyone else around her. Then acts surprised when potential boyfriends flee in the opposite direction. Along with everyone else.
Singapore doesn't celebrate Thanksgiving. Its a little-known Western holiday. For some who deign a nod in the direction of Western culture and mannerisms, Thanksgiving is just another excuse to eat turkey.
I, however, have plenty to give thanks for - too much work (that means I have a job), too much housework (I have a roof over my head), too much laundry (hey, many millions of people have no clothes to wear!) and so on it goes.
What I really need to give thanks for is the fact that I'm not married.
Yes, you read that right. NOT, N-O-T married.
And loving it.
When I look at my peers, struggling with (naggy) wife, (whiny) kids and (mountainous) bills, I truly get down on my knees and give thanks to my Great God that He saw fit to not put marriage in His Grand Design for me.
I spent Thanksgiving with my best friend, another MGTOW like me. He had dinner at my place which I cooked (how many modern aka "empowered" women know even HOW to roast a turkey breast?), then we spent a pleasant evening playing Scrabble and laughing.
As the disease of Feminism darkens even Asia's societies, its interesting to note that like every epidemic, it mutates. Like unto swine flu, H1N1 which has now become H2N3 (!!), Feminism mutates to conform when its previous machinations turn sour. I'm thinking of Debbie Maken and her much touted Marriage Mandate. It would seem that in the past the femcunts ever complained that "marriage was slavery". Now in the wake of the Marriage Strike, when their "slaves" are fleeing to the hills to avoid marriage, these femcunts abruptly don the "conservative woman" mask and start screaming that "no one wants to marry me!". Suddenly the shoe is on the other foot a là Debbie Maken with even rabid feminists screaming for marriage, and it would be funny except that its not.
So I wish all my MGTOW brothers a happy, sane and single Thanksgiving even though the holiday is over. Long may we stand uncontaminated by skanks and sluts.
Ahhhh - she was the one who wrote an article lambasting gay marriage which somehow managed to draw the death of Stephen Gately into the picture.
Deliberate? Or just plain S-T-U-P-I-D, stoooopiiid stupid?
Now I haven't any bone to pick if you are plain against civil unions of the homosexual variety. Its your point of view. You're entitled to it. But to write an article about it and draw in a celebrity whose recent death struck a raw chord in the music industry is just plain dumb. Even worse, the dumb bee-yotch managed to attribute Gately's death to unnatural causes (his homosexuality) and concluded, smugly, that there was no "happily ever" after for gay marriage.
But women are like that. Act first, think later. Then act shocked when the article drew an unprecedented 25,000 complaints. Even commentators on Yahoo! have purported that "if you manage offend a Daily Mail reader, you have gone too far". Did any of that register with Miss Jan 'shit-for-brains' Moir? Nope. All she cared for was the triumph of her skewed views, sans logic and compassion, and went to press with it.
After even record company Polydor registered its disgust, 'shit-for-brains' Moir did an abrupt volte-face . She issued a public apology. Yup, you read that right. She issued a public apology. She did not take down her article, nor retrace her comments, she just issued a public apology which, in the light of its oily attempts at mea culpa was really no apology at all.
Like I said, women are stupid beyond belief, as Jan Moir has demonstrated and is reinforced by the actions of Gema Revelles. For readers' interests, Revelles cooked up a false rape accusation against her former employer, then expressed disbelief that the "English authorities would take the attitude they did" and slap a nine-month prison sentence on her.
Lately, more and more blogs are focusing on what a bad deal women are for men. In Feminism's wake, we have landed squarely in a culture of allegations that have made it impossible for men. It has gotten so bad that recently a South American man has been jailed for kissing his 8-year old daughter on the beach!
Since the femnags keep trumpeting that women need men like a fish needs a bicycle, in-fighting along those lines can prove very rewarding. It has already been written across the web that modern women are narcissistic, egotistical bitches. Turn that "I, Me, My" attitude on its head by not pandering to her at all and the results may be entertainingly ballistic.
Simply put, modern women have a grossly inflated sense of self-worth. They feel they are too good for men. That would explain the influx of sites like Facebook and Twitter. My counter is equally simple. Become Zero Tolerant and have nothing to do with them. It translates into "if-you-are-too-good-for-me-then-you-don't-need-me". And watch them hit the roof!
May I then offer a few tips on erecting and maintaining this façade of a Zero Tolerance Man:
1 - Disdain
This is your best defence. Treat women like a nasty smell, a freshly squashed cockroach or turds is certain to make your point. I go about on public transport with a stony look at all times. As a friend of mine put it, "it makes winter seem warm". You may have to cultivate this "look of hate" especially if it goes against your grain. But the end result is worth it.
2 - Avoidance
- Treat women like they don't exist. Look straight through them. If they are texting/gossiping/reading while walking, don't turn aside, walk straight into them. And walk on without either apologizing or acknowledging.
- Talk to women only when absolutely necessary. Choose your words carefully and limit your answers to monosyllables if needs be. If they initiate the conversation, end it abruptly and walk away.
- In public, avoid women. On the bus, park yourself near groups of men rather than women, or choose to sit with men for example. If that gets branded you a homosexual, so what? Better wrongly classed as gay than to have your life ruined by false rape/molestation accusations.
- Do not let women chat you up at parties. Disengage at the earliest opportunity if stuck.
- Do not date. If you must, ensure she pays her share. Any women who sees you as a meal ticket should not even be given the courtesy of a night out.
3 - Boycott
- DO NOT MARRY! No fault divorce has become commonplace. Too common. And why, for that matter, should a man hand over half of his present assets as well as half of his future earnings to some undeserving bitch just because she got bored with married life?
- DO NOT COHABIT! In some countries and its becoming commonplace too, that to have a woman live with you is enough for her to demand a chunk of it. Letting a woman into your house is a ruinous decision. Period.
- AVOID SINGLE MOTHERS! They are the worst deal on the planet. Why pay for child rearing when they are not yours? They will resent you because you are not their father. You can't discipline them. You are not her first priority.
- Have nothing to do with companies who use misandric advertising or male-bashing tactics. If we can't abide by racism, is misandry any different? My previous post Misandric = Boycott had a list of companies to boycott. Check this website Stand Your Ground for updates to that list.
4 - Go Your Own Way aka MGTOW
- You always come first. Never forget that.
- Dress for yourself to look your best, not because some woman wants you to.
- Likewise drive the car you want/like, and not some flashy set of wheels to impress women -not worth it.
- Eat what you want, when you want.
- Pursue sport, hobbies, pastimes that are edifying to you.
- Work on self-improvement.
5. Always Know Where Your Sperm Are
- If your sexual drive gets the better of you, masturbate. You're in control, its easy, gratifying and instantaneous. The sin of Onan was, contrary to what the fire-eating Baptists may preach, interrupted intercourse, NOT masturbation. ("And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother's wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother. [Genesis 38:9])
- The blogs are awash with horror stories of women stuffing their vaginas with the sperm from used condoms, and then suing the man for child support when they get pregnant. If you must have sex, use condoms. And always keep the used condom wadded up in a tissue where she can't reach for it, or flush it down the toilet repeatedly till it disappears, or burn it.
- Use industrial strength spermicide inside and out. For safety sake, stick a spermicidal pessary into her as well.
- The most radical method is to get a vasectomy. Store sperm in a bank before going for the snip. After the procedure, obtain a notarised document from BOTH lawyer and surgeon stating that the surgery was carried out. Also obtain two or three sperm test records that show absence of sperm. That way, if the woman threatens you with a child-support lawsuit, insist on a paternity test and show her the documents. Then coldly watch her bluster and her dreams crumble. (Note: this trick originally came from someone called Zammo on Dump Your Wife NOW!)
What the press has succeeded, thus far, is bestowing victimhood on the false accuser, hiding her name and her picture. Now, thanks to the due diligence of MarkyMark, we know what she looks like and her name!
That's what she looks like and DANMELL NDONYE is her name. Take note, all, for that is the face of a liar. Danmell Ndonye had a five-man sex orgy in a college bathroom and later accused the 5 men she had sex with of rape. Although Danmell Ndonye later recanted (as usual), the writing is on the wall for the 5 men she falsely accused.
An interesting comment surfaced on The False Rape Society. There, someone said that Danmell Ndonye hadn't been punished as she had been punished enough. Think about it he said, Danmell Ndonye has been suspended from college and is unlikely that other colleges will now accept her, Danmell Ndonye has a bad rap, Danmell Ndonye won't be able to get a boyfriend, etc etc.
You know what? Tough shit! If Danmell Ndonye can't do any of the aforementioned things, then its Danmell Ndonye's own fault. If Danmell Ndonye has jeopardised the reputations of an entire reputation of African women, then its Danmell Ndonye's own fault. Danmell Ndonye should have considered these matters out of hand before making that accusation. I care not one whit about poetic justice. If Danmell Ndonye is a false accuser, then it is my duty to let the world know that Danmell Ndonye is to be avoided.
You might have noticed that I used Danmell Ndonye's name a great deal. I got that idea from MarkyMark. He, too, used Danmell Ndonye's name at every conceivable opportunity and I quote: "As a public service, I ... am posting here for the world to see; men need to KNOW what this sociopathic bitch looks like!! I think it's only fitting, since she didn't receive any punishment for her crime."
I may only one single man here in Singapore. But ... little things can, and do add up to large amounts. I can, and will make sure that Danmell Ndonye's name is trumpeted across this viral media we know as the Internet. I also will make sure that in using Danmell Ndonye's name, the search engines will pick it up and know what a detestable creature she is.
If I had to give thanks for one thing, I mean the one thing I am truly grateful for, it would have to be technology. Today, with modern appliances I can get dinner on the table in 30 minutes, communicate in real time with my counterpart halfway across the world, buy things online that are otherwise unavailable in my part of the world, and the list goes on.
Which set me thinking. If women claim to be better than men, does that claim stand up to the test of time? I decided to hit my library to see if women had made any inventions which contribute to the betterment of our lives as we know it today:
Electricity -Benjamin Franklin (Discoverer); Male Computer -Charles Babbage/Alan Turing/Konrad Zuse (Inventor/s); Male Telephone -Alexander Graham Bell (Inventor); Male Cellphone - Martin Cooper (Inventor); Male Car -George A. Long/Karl Benz (Inventor/s); Male Washing machine -Jacob Christian Schäffer/Henry Sidgier/Nathaniel Briggs (Inventor/s); Male Microwave oven -Percy Spencer (Inventor); Male Television -Philo Taylor Farnsworth (Inventor); Male Radio -Guglielmo Marconi/Nicola Tesla/Alexander Popov (Inventor/s); Male Sewing Machine -Barthelemy Thimmonier/Elias Howe/Isaac Singer (Inventor/s); Male
From the list it is clear. All the devices which we take for granted today and have significantly impacted our lives have all been propounded by MEN. This is just the tip of the iceberg. I haven't even included those from history. So where are the wimmin? And where are their inventions? By the way I don't consider trouble an invention.
It is blatantly obvious. Men are responsible for what we have today. We are also responsible for no longer having to live in caves, which may well be a plausible scenario had we left it to wimmin.
I've been busy, very busy. Also a change in the weather here in Singapore has brought the germs and I came down with a nasty cold and cough.
At least I've got work to do. Not unlike the femnags who sit around on their great fat tushies all day and bash men.
Which got me thinking.
I was listening, well re-listening really, to the B-minor Mass whilst marking student assignments and the thought struck me: Where are the female composers?
That got me excited so I Googled it.
Wikipedia was the first entry and it trumpeted a long list of female composers from pre-1500 to the present. Trolling it, I made a surprising (!?) discovery: in over a millenia, there have been only a few notable female composers and these can be counted on the fingers of one hand.
1. Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179)\
2. Eleanor of Aquitaine (1122-1204)
3. Maria Malibran (1808-1836)
4. the Boulanger sisters - Lili (1893-1918) and Nadia (1887-1979)
And of these female composers, only Hildegard of Bingen and Nadia Boulanger have recordings attributed to them.
So, if women are better than men, why are the CD catalogues teeming with recordings by the greats - Bach, Charpentier, Mozart, Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Tchaikovsky, Schubert, Schumann et al? Why are the performance artists clamouring to perform works by the very same, and are not supremely eager to champion a work by, say Amy Beach? (By the way, Amy Beach "composes" such racuous nonsense I can't even call it music. I don't know anybody who does!)
So the point is clear: in music the men reign. Maybe they'll get round to it next time.
That's what I asked myself after watching an encore telecast of our Nation's 44th Independence celebrations a.k.a. the National Day Parade.
To begin with, the traditional march-past was relegated to a minor episode in the shindig -Chapter 3 for the record. Now, Singapore's defences may not be much, unlike Brazil or Argentina who, when they celebrate Independence, they trot out all their colours and it takes all day to march past. But this is a parade, hello-o-o-o?
Instead, what we had was a history of Singapore "told in 10 chapters" according to the commentators. First up, founding our Island Nation with ham actors Mark Lee and Suhaimi Yusof playing Parameswara and Sang Nila Utama respectively. Backed by a swirling melange of secondary school students -this year's "choir"- they hammed it up big time. Oh well, I guess there are worse ways to narrate history.
And that "choir"! Now yours truly was honoured to be in the very first parade that incorporated a choral element way back in 1981. We not only had to sing the newest songs composed for the nation, but re-learn existing ones with 4-part harmony! A very Villa-Lobos-esque moment occurred in 1983 when we were told that the pledge for that year would not be recited but sung! Anyway, this year's "choir" did more running around waving great paws made of some strange orange material rather than singing! And if a choir's not to sing, then WTF are they there for? They did not even sing the National Anthem!
The second chapter is a long drawn out affair on "Defending Our Nation". All I can say is that its elaborately staged, interspersing CNA-esque footage with our "military assets" (commentator's words) doing everything from neutralising bombs to disarming terrorists. Hey, they'd better be as good if the real thing comes along!
This year's highlight was to have been a united Pledge Moment at 8:22pm on the day itself. I was at the supermarket with my mother at that exact same time and, do you know, even when it was announced, no one stopped to recite the Pledge? Talk about National Solidarity!
I won't say anymore. Patriotism is fine when you are swept away by the heat of the moment, i.e. watching the parade at Marina Bay itself. Cast in a colder light the "parade" um ... doesn't hold up. They've had their share of lulus in the past, such as an enormous cake-like edifice that was the crowning glory of the 25th Parade in 1990; or the appearance of the season 1 Singapore Idol finalists in 40th year parade. But this!
I won't be a sourpuss so ... Happy 44th Birthday Singapore!
But we'll certainly have to do better with a display which is more National Day Farce than National Day Parade!
Lately the blogs are all abuzz with how women are better than men.
So in this new series, I thought I'd take a look at all the areas where women claim to be better than men. And what better place to start with than the Nobel Prize?
The Nobel Prize has been awarded since 1901, and is always given to outstanding achievements in the fields of Chemistry, Physiology/Medicine, Physics, Literature and Peace. There is also an associated prize, The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. Instituted by Sweden's central bank in 1968, this was first awarded in 1969. With the sole exception of the Peace category, all the major contending categories are male-dominated.
Since 1901, there have been 754 male Nobel Prize winners and 35 female ones. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_Nobel_laureates) 35 wimmen in a century, with many years having no female nominee at all. The numbers speak for themselves.
I came across this whilst searching for quotes to enliven my next few posts when I came across this. Its from a blog called Hunting For Archetypes (http://huntingforarchetypes.blogspot.com/) and its a good read, albeit somewhat inflammatory. A private message was attacked and the attack is summarized as: "Real" feminists (from the early 20th century) would vomit acid if they knew what would happen to "their" movement. The people calling themselves that today are usually vile people who hijacked a noble cause. Therefore, it's unfair to label all feminists as being the same."
Here is the blogger's response to that attack. Enjoy!
Well, it's "actual Feminists" tough luck then, because present day Feminists are female-supremacist manhaters, and their reputation is well earned, and will only get worse (I hope and pray)।
The ideology, and more importantly the RESULTS of the ideology, are destructive, divisive, sexist, and morally repugnant. Adherence to feminist principles has led to laws and policies which have almost completely succeeded in sundering society right down gender lines, with two-tier citizenship in all but name.
I don't care one iota if hundreds or even thousands of "good feminists" are "unfairly" slighted by inclusion. If they were such "good Feminists" they wouldn't have allowed this to happen. Failing that, they would be ACTIVELY supporting men's rights organizations, rather than submitting them to a tortuous propaganda smear job.
The proof is in the pudding, and quite frankly NONE (and I'm dead serious when I say this), absolutely none of you have shown any way in which women are actually "oppressed", and I can show inequality ENSHRINED IN LAW against men....and you say "that's justified" by Patriarchy Theory. Fair enough, I say "prove it" since all these things were done in the name of this theory.
NONE of you ever have. Not one of you can even explain what it means beyond a vague "men are in charge" definition. None of you can show a single benefit of any importance to men as a result of societal bias, let alone socially condoned behaviour or even law. There's PLENTY of evidence of it going the other way though.
So do I think every single person who self-identifies as a Feminist deserves to be lumped in with the "extremists"?
Stand Your Ground (http://www.standyourground.com/boyc.php) has a fabulous list of companies that ABSOLUTELY must be boycotted from the misandric tone of their advertising. This ranges from mildy offensive (but offensive nevertheless) jokes making fun of men, to downright odious man-bashing.
While most of the companies are American, quite a few stand out because they have reached an overseas audience too. Unfortunately, these are companies whom we ourselves patronize with nary a second thought as to the tenor of their advertising/marketing. This goes to prove that if we spread the message as far as we can reach, these companies will feel the loss of revenue and (hopefully) change their tune. Even though some of these ads are long gone, we must show these companies that MRAs are like elephants - we never forget. And if by not forgetting we vote with our feet as well as with our dollars, so much the better!
Some of these companies I now list below:
Heineken: offensive ad with Carrie-Ann Moss
Ford Motors: male-bashing commercial
Post-It Notes a.k.a 3M: misandric, prejudiced and discriminatory product captions
The Body Shop: blatant anti-male campaign
Reebok: misandric TV ads displaying men acting like fools
Walls Ice Cream (UK): male bashing commercial; entitlement princess glorified
Subway: Male-bashing ad
Liz Claiborne: Misandric report & radio ad campaign
Toys R Us: Anti-boy TV commercial
Quantas: discrimination against men, male hatred
Air New Zealand: Same as Quantas
British Airways: Same as Quantas
Nokia: Misandric ad, capitalizing off misandry
Kraft Foods: Male-bashing ad
V8: Drink radio commercial demeans men
Trojan condoms: Especially offensive & misandric commercial
Pepsi: (Unfunny, atrocious & offensive) male sexual mutilation & groin jokes
I'll be especially alert to publicise my boycott (and reasons why) of these companies from now and forever more. Definitely I've eaten my last Subway (**sigh**) and drunk my last Pepsi (**double sigh**). But sacrifices have to made for the good of MRA. If these companies blatantly profit off man-bashing then I, for one, do not want my (hard-earned) dollars to go anywhere near them. Simply put, they do not deserve it.
Every day, as I read the blogs I'm "tuned" into, I'm seeing more and more links to anti-misandry.
This can only be a good thing.
However, most of these sites still just bewail the sad state of affairs. We, as men, still have to take the reins and not figuratively raise the white flag of surrender just because Feminism keeps shifting the goal post. Most MRA sites have concluded that Feminism a.k.a Fembots a.k.a. Femcunts a.k.a. Feminazis are incapable of logic. They just spew their vitriol and/or cut off anyone attempting to reason with them. This, then, is one of the golden rules for dealing with the abovementioned trash. Simply, and coldly state the facts, pointing out the glaring omissions in her faulty logic and watch her take flight.
Of note are the followings sites and blogs I have found:
The last site -Stand Your Ground- has a fantastic section on companies that should be boycotted because of misandry and/or male-bashing. I was horrified to find Subway, Nokia, Pepsi and even Toys R Us among the list. Suffice to say I will never eat another Subway sandwich, drink Pepsi or buy from Toys R Us. I will also urge my male friends to use other mobile phones such as Samsung rather than Nokia. If enough of us boycott the brand, it should send a wake up call to said companies that the male dollar is just as valuable as the Femcunt one. Unless said companies are as arrogant as the Singapore government, who, at one time sought to persecute the gay community but said nothing when it came to receiving business from the "pink dollar".
MarkyMark (whose blog links to mine in the blogroll and I his likewise) had this post which made me flip. Suffice to say, its not the sort of thing I'd ideally want to read on the Fourth of July holiday. I also chose not respond to the post comment-wise, but saved it to expound here on my own blog.
This woman, Kim, begins in typical feminazi-style: "You can NOT blame this ALL on women.It’s not the women running the show when it comes to passing laws, its men.But you already knew this.So why are the MRAs bashing women?" I wonder if she'd just fallen off the turnip truck to make a statement like this. Where have the women been if not running the show for the last 40 years? Plus making snide statements along the way like The man is the head of the house and the women the neck, but its the neck that turns the head. As further proof of this exploitative manipulation, witness what the femcunts did to Obama's stimulus package ["No Country For Burly Men", http://dontmarry.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/no-country-for-burly-men/].
She then goes into an orgy of whinging about being indoctrinated into the feminist mentality, about how it coloured her peceptions etc etc. At the heart of this crap (yes, that's what it is) is still the Entitlement Princess' voice - "me", "me", "me"; "I", "I", "I"; "gimme", "gimme", "gimme" (but alas for her, no Man After Midnight).
After her self-pitying and self-proselytising, the heart of the matter is the paragraph where she claims women want to hear the magic words. That women are still loved, still wanted, will still be taken care of by men. Uh, uh darling. I don't think so. After 4 decades of being told that "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle", and force-fed the notion that men are no more than cannon-fodder in the gender war, guess what? Men have walked away! Its a surprising action. Where the masses would have expected men to fight, tooth and nail, for what's right, instead men have chosen to vote with their feet. They walked away. And are still walking away. As fast as their feet will carry them if I may add.
The worst is when she claims that feminism is a mistake. A MISTAKE!!!! And to even suggest that men are culpable in the perpetration of this odious "mistake" is too much. I speak for myself here. But I cannot, in all honesty, think of even ONE man, after 40 years of feminist claptrap, will willingly crawl contritely, cap in hand, when a woman crooks her finger and decides to write off 40 years of demonizing men as "A MISTAKE".
She then claims: "These young women are going through this, they are hurting.They aren’t acting this way because they like it.They act this way because they are told these things, and now they are lost." This is complete and utter bollocks. Women get their kicks from demeaning men, preferably publicly because they feel its cool to do so. It gives them power - Empowerment (to use a feminazi term) if you will. Then to turn around and utter that "its ok to NEED a man.Just say the words and you’ll hear the sighs of a million women in unison from across this country" is hypocrisy at its feminist best. This, with a brazen demand for, but couched in hypocritical mea culpa that we men turn around and clean up feminism's shit? Most men would say in response "STFU" and "FOS" (I'll leave you to decode those acronyms yourself!).
Feminism has already seen the signs of its implosion. Its hold was vacuous and tenuous at best. Men do not need to apologize for 40 years of Feminism. We neither wanted nor condoned Feminism although it was foisted on us nonetheless. Nor should we tolerate "mistakes" like Andrea Dworkin, Betty Friedan, Maureen O'Dowd and their ilk. It is the spawn of Feminism, the armies of women today crying out that no man will even look their way who should atone for the grievous sins they have committed against men. And beg to be restored to their rightful places as wives and mothers. Preferably on their knees.
Realizing that more than a year has slipped by with no post is disconcerting.
Realizing that notable luminaries in the Mens' Rights Activism (MRA) circle -MarkyMark for one- has added you to his blogroll and you have no new posts to show is downright dismaying.
In the past I was a lurker on the boards and forums for Mens' Rights, along with notable websites for anti-misandry. Getting into a state of righteous indignation was well and good. BUT ... I also realized that getting all worked up from the comfort of your armchair while others pulled the plough was not cool. So I have decided that my hand must till the land too.
Unfortunately I am only one man, and one man in Singapore where misandry is slowly but surely encroaching. What is one to do? Campaigning against Singapore's draconian government is folly. I can, thus, only spread the word by blogging. Hopefully men will read, open their eyes and above all, know what is befalling them.
All my previous posts were carefully "cooked" before being published. This ensured I had said what needed saying in the best possible language. While I am not about to remove those older postings, current and future posts will now reflect what's currently happening, especially if the subject is MRA and/or anti-misandry. I'm not above the occasionally "cooked" post (there are several waiting in the wings) for reader enjoyment. By and large, this new direction should enable me to post with greater frequency.
I'm not your average Joe, quite the opposite in fact! Having no looks to speak of, I make up for it with a carefully cultivated manner and exquisite clothes. It helps that I'm a trainer in multimedia -waving your arms before a captive audience is gratifying! Now that I'm past 40, life is good, midlife crises notwithstanding!